Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarking study demonstrates improved multimodal emotion recognition across conversational benchmarks, indicating the utility of quantum-inspired dynamic fusion and entangled measurements.
Multimodal emotion recognition in conversation (MERC) integrates textual, acoustic, visual, and contextual cues to identify each utterance’s emotion. Classical models encode temporal and cross-modal relations through recurrence, graphs, or attention, whereas quantum-inspired models largely retain static states and separable measurements, leaving operator-level evolution and coherence-aware joint readout under-modelled. To address these limitations, we propose QESM, which integrates Unitary Temporal Evolution (UTE), OTOC Cross-Modal Scrambling (OCS), and Entangled Born Measurement (EBM). UTE propagates speaker-aware emotional context through norm-preserving unitary phase evolution. Inspired by the OTOC, OCS models dynamic cross-modal complementarity by quantifying how strongly one temporally evolved modality perturbs the interpretation of another. Inspired by the non-separability of quantum entanglement, EBM constructs a bipartite entangled state over the modality-identity and modality-representation spaces and separately derives class-wise Born measurement responses from cross-modal phase coherence and trimodal class agreement. Experiments on the 7433-utterance IEMOCAP and 13,708-utterance MELD datasets show that QESM achieves the highest weighted-F1 among the compared methods, reaching 73.23% and 67.31%, respectively, with five-seed means of 72.82 ± 0.23 % and 67.17 ± 0.11 % . Based on the unrounded WF1 scores, these representative results are 1.29 and 1.08 percentage points higher than QR-Net, respectively. Paired tests show significant gains over several baselines, whereas the difference between QESM and QR-Net is nonsignificant after Holm correction. Ablation and control studies show that QESM effectively captures temporal context and dynamic cross-modal complementarity while enabling coherence-aware joint measurement
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: