Retrospective cohort study reveals femoral-head survival after allograft fibular support in osteonecrosis, indicating higher failure risks in extensive lesions.
This study evaluated mid- to long-term femoral-head survival following allograft fibular support (AFS) for Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) type C non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) at the pre-collapse or early-collapse stage and examined factors associated with prognosis. This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 68 patients (74 hips) with JIC type C1 or C2 non-traumatic ONFH at Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage II or IIIA treated with AFS between 2015 and 2022. Each hip was the analysis unit, and patient-clustered robust variance was used to account for bilateral hips. Kaplan‑Meier survival estimates and univariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate B-grade collapse (BGC) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) as two separate endpoint events. Multivariable models were not fitted because only 16 BGC and seven THA events occurred. Sixteen hips (21.6%) developed BGC, and seven hips (9.5%) underwent THA. Median observation time was 30.39 months (IQR, 24.93–40.13; range, 16.87–62.47 months). Estimated 3-year survival was 74.6% (95% CI, 60.6%–84.3%) with BGC as the endpoint and 88.9% (95% CI, 75.7%–95.2%) with THA as the endpoint. The 5-year estimates were numerically unchanged, but only two hips remained at risk at 60 months. Compared with C1, C2 was associated with higher average hazards of BGC (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.28–10.77; p = 0.015) and THA (HR, 8.22; 95% CI, 1.50–45.17; p = 0.015). AFS may be a promising structural hip-preserving option for selected patients with JIC type C ONFH at ARCO stage II or IIIA. Type C2 lesions had poorer observed survival than type C1 lesions. The 3-year estimates are supported by the available follow-up, whereas the numerically unchanged 5-year estimates are exploratory. Prospective comparative studies incorporating validated patient-reported outcomes are required before treatment efficacy can be established. Not applicable; this was a retrospective observational cohort and participants were not prospectively assigned to an intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: