Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Linguistic analysis reveals complex translation barriers for irony between English and Uzbek literary texts, highlighting the necessity of a multidimensional linguopragmatic model.
Irony is one of the most complex phenomena in literary discourse because its intended meaning frequently differs from its literal linguistic expression. This discrepancy becomes particularly problematic in literary translation, where ironic meaning depends not only on lexical and grammatical structures but also on context, speaker intention, cultural knowledge, evaluative attitudes, and pragmatic inference. The present article examines the major problems involved in translating irony between English and Uzbek literary discourse. The article proposes an authorial linguopragmatic model consisting of five analytical parameters: literal expression, contextual contradiction, implied meaning, communicative intention, and translation effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilufarkhan Ergashali qizi Ismoiljonova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: