Human-Centered Workspace Optimization: A 2 × 2 Factorial Study of Adjustable Furniture and Indoor Environmental Quality

Small workspaces function as integrated systems, yet ergonomic furniture and indoor environmental conditions are usually evaluated separately. A six-site, assessor-blinded, randomized 2 × 2 factorial controlled study was conducted of two multicomponent packages-adjustable furniture and optimized indoor environmental quality (IEQ)-among 240 office workers for four weeks. Each group included 60 participants. Overall comfort in week 4 was highest for both packages (5.62 ± 0.53 versus 3.99 ± 0.60 with fixed furniture and basic IEQ). In a site-adjusted factorial model with HC3 robust standard errors, the adjustable-furniture effect was 0.86 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.09), the optimized-IEQ effect was 0.34 points (95% CI, 0.12-0.55), and their interaction was 0.44 points (95% CI, 0.14-0.74). Adjustable furniture improved postural comfort and reduced neck and lower back discomfort; optimized IEQ improved environmental comfort; both packages improved perceived productivity, satisfaction, and fatigue. The task-accuracy interaction did not remain significant after false-discovery-rate adjustment, and exploratory mediation and spline analyses did not support indirect or nonlinear effects. These results support coordinated ergonomic and environmental implementation while preserving distinct outcome pathways.