Lab-in-the-field experiment demonstrates that targeted information on price and academic benefits increases glasses adoption among myopic students, highlighting a cost-effective behavioral solution.
Inaccurate information and biased beliefs about myopia and glasses-wearing can lead to low take-up of eyeglasses among myopic students. This paper provides experimental evidence on behavioral barriers affecting students’ belief updating and stated preferences regarding glasses-wearing. We conducted a lab-in-the-field experiment with 8262 middle school students in a remote, underdeveloped county in China to test four targeted information nudges. Among myopic students without glasses, information on glasses prices and the short-term academic benefits of wearing glasses was most effective. The nudges worked by updating beliefs or increasing the salience of myopia and glasses-wearing, with substantial heterogeneity by myopia duration, academic performance, and peer groups. Cost–benefit analysis shows that targeted nudges remain cost-effective even under conservative take-up assumptions. Our results provide evidence of the importance of precise, personalized information nudges in improving students’ educational input and academic achievement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Economics of Education Review