Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial demonstrates computer-delivered education increases internal condom use among African American women, highlighting accessible female-initiated HIV prevention.
This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether HALO (Healthy Alternatives, Loving Ourselves), a brief computer-delivered intervention, increases internal condom (IC) use for HIV/STI prevention among African American women compared to print materials. We recruited 102 women aged 18–50 at risk for HIV from a Washington DC clinic and randomized them to HALO ( n = 52) or control ( n = 50). Participants completed surveys assessing IC use, knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months post-intervention. Women assigned to HALO reported significantly higher rates of IC-protected vaginal sex acts over the study interval (condition × slope estimate = 0.04, SE = 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.09], p = .050). The proportion of vaginal sex acts protected by ICs increased from 4.8% at baseline to 21.1% at 2 months among HALO participants versus 7.3% among controls. At 4 months, these proportions were 15.7% and 7.2%, respectively. HALO participants reported more frequent use of insertion strategies ( p = .00), more favorable IC attitudes ( p = .00), and greater self-efficacy ( p = .01). Participants’ views of ICs enhancing sexual experiences ( p = .00) and providing protection ( p = .00) improved significantly. Among African American women attending an urban clinic, this computer-based intervention was associated with increased IC use and improved attitudes over 4 months. Future research should examine longer-term outcomes and implementation strategies to expand access to female-initiated HIV/STI prevention options, including adaptations for diverse populations such as transgender women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leaf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: