Computational study uncovers divergent selectivity steps and shared chiral pocket stereocontrol in ynamide-mediated couplings, highlighting pathways for rational asymmetric catalyst design.
Direct atroposelective coupling of carboxylic acids with amines and alcohols remains challenging. Although recent ynamide-mediated reactions under chiral phosphoric acid (CPA) catalysis have provided efficient access to axial-chiral amides and planar-chiral esters, the activation mode and origin of stereocontrol remain unclear. Here, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on two representative CPA-catalyzed ynamide-mediated transformations, namely atroposelective amidation and atroposelective esterification of carboxylic acids. The results reveal a common hydrogen-bond-bridged dual-substrate activation mode, followed by the formation of a tightly associated chiral phosphate-paired keteniminium-like intermediate in which hydrogen-bonding and ion-pairing interactions coexist, trapped by the carboxylic acid to generate an α-acyloxy enamide, and subsequent coupling with the external nucleophile. Interestingly, the two reactions do not share the same atropo-determining step. In the amidation reaction, reversible amine addition is followed by atropo-determining concerted C–O bond cleavage and protonation, whereas in the esterification reaction the initial alcohol addition is atropo-determining. This divergence likely originates from differences in nucleophile reactivity and in the relative stability of the addition intermediates. Despite the kinetic difference, both reactions follow a common stereocontrol mode: the observed atroposelectivity arises from free energy differences between matched and mismatched substrate accommodation within the chiral CPA pocket. These findings provide a mechanistic foundation for CPA-catalyzed ynamide-mediated atroposelective coupling and may provide insight for the rational design of related asymmetric catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: