Conceptual analysis outlines a metaphysical architecture of mind, language, and interstitial space, highlighting the separation of philosophical axioms from empirical physics.
This conceptual note records the metaphysical and religious-philosophical layer proposed alongside the physical Genki Theory research framework. It defines Moto as the origin of embodied intention; Igen as a hypothesized agency associated with Ma; words as jointly created structures of mind and body; and Ma as a proposed overlapping interstitial universe and locus of mind-energy and the sacred. Glossolalia, prophecy and prediction are recorded as interpretations of information emerging from Ma through words. These propositions are metaphysical axioms and interpretive hypotheses, not experimentally established facts. The physical and metaphysical layers are explicitly separated. No scientific proof of gods, spirits, prophecy, hidden-universe communication or physical mind-energy is claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshimitsu Katayama (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: