Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formal mathematical analysis demonstrates necessary conditions for robust survival in recursively constrained systems, highlighting how localized structural defects trigger systemic collapse.
We introduce a general theorem framework for systems whose persistence depends on reconciling local transitions with whole-system viability. The framework is intentionally abstract: it applies to record-bearing, recursively constrained systems equipped with transitions, viability conditions, traces, channels, anchors or proxies, and a local-to-global compatibility relation. We then develop a theorem spine in three levels. First, a family of foothill theorems shows that local structural defects induce failure of corresponding system-level robustness properties. Second, a family of ridge theorems composes these failures into broader structural impossibility results concerning proxy guidance, local admissibility, correction through multiplicity, and viability support through sufficient capacity. Third, a summit abstraction, BoundaryDefect, unifies the main defect families and yields a general viability-boundary theorem: whenever a system exhibits any one of the identified boundary defects, it fails a corresponding schema of robust viable continuation. The abstract theorem family is fully proved in Lean; the domain sections that follow are interpretation schemas and corollary schemas, not full domain formalizations. The framework is machine-checked and is designed to support disciplined instantiation across diverse domains, including self-modifying AI systems, legal and institutional orders, organismal and ecological systems, markets, civilization-scale coordination systems, and other recursively constrained structures. Trust boundary. Machine-checked claims are those in -continuation-lean matching . Domain vignettes and bridge narratives are schemas, not additional closed theorems unless a bridge module proves a toy witness. Summit anchors: _conditions_for_robust_viable_continuation; _viability_boundary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nova Spivack (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: