Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational validation demonstrates high classification accuracy across motor EEG paradigms using source localization and residual transformers, suggesting improved reliability for assistive...
Decoding motor intentions from non-invasive scalp EEG remains a core challenge in brain–computer interface research, due to spatial blurring, low signal-to-noise ratio, and inter-subject variability. This work introduces PRSEPTransformer-EEG, a unified framework that integrates standardized preprocessing, source localization using sLORETA, and a deep learning model that combines squeeze–excitation residual blocks with a positional-encoding Transformer encoder. The framework is evaluated across three public datasets, encompassing both motor imagery and motor execution paradigms recorded via gel-based, water-based, and dry electrodes. On the BCI Competition IV 2a dataset, the model achieves 99.53 % accuracy in the Beta band, surpassing the best previously reported results. On the BCI2000 four-class imagery dataset, it reaches 98.29 % in the Beta band and exceeds 92 % across all typical frequency ranges, outperforming existing source and sensor space models. Results from the reach-and-grasp dataset further confirm that source-space decoding offers substantial gains when high-density recordings are available, while sensor-level features remain effective in sparse configurations. These findings demonstrate that combining source-space projection with temporally attentive spatial encoding can substantially advance the reliability of non-invasive EEG decoding for both clinical and assistive applications. Our code is available at (https://github.com/sinamakhdoomi/PRSEPTransfromerEEG.git).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaviri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: