Key result
Mild social stress improves executive function in COMT-Val158 homozygotes but impairs COMT-Met158 carriers.
Why the study?
It was predicted that mild stress would improve executive functions in COMT-Val carriers but impair them in COMT-Met carriers, but previous studies had only shown impairment in COMT-Mets.
Does mild social evaluative stress improve or impair executive functions depending on COMT genotype?
RCT (n=140)
Testers were blind to participants' genotypes
Randomized crossover order of stress and calm sessions
No
Does mild social evaluative stress improve or impair executive functions depending on COMT genotype?
This study provides the first evidence of a double dissociation between COMT genotype and cognitive performance under mild stress versus calm conditions.
We present here the first evidence of the much-predicted double dissociation between the effect of stress on cognitive skills [executive functions (EFs)] dependent on prefrontal cortex (PFC) by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotype. The COMT gene polymorphism with methionine (Met) at codon 158 results in more dopamine (DA) in PFC and generally better EFs, while with valine (Val) at codon 158 the result is less PFC DA and generally poorer EFs. Many have predicted that mild stress, by raising PFC DA levels should aid EFs of COMT-Vals (bringing their PFC DA levels up, closer to optimal) and impair EFs of COMT-Mets (raising their PFC DA levels past optimal). We tested 140 men and women in a within-subject crossover design using extremely mild social evaluative stress. On trials requiring EFs (incongruent trials) of the Flanker/Reverse Flanker task, COMT-Val158 homozygotes performed better when mildly stressed than when calmer, while COMT-Met158 carriers performed worse when mildly stressed. Two other teams previously tried to obtain this, but only found stress impairing EFs of COMT-Mets, not improving EFs of COMT-Vals. Perhaps we found both because we used a much milder stressor. Evidently, the bandwidth for stress having a facilitative effect on EFs is exceedingly narrow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zareyan et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy young adults (n=140). Mild social evaluative stress vs. Calmer condition (no observers) was evaluated on Reaction time on incongruent trials of the Flanker/Reverse Flanker task (ηp2 = 0.34 (Val homozygotes); ηp2 = 0.26 (Met carriers), p=<0.001). Mild social evaluative stress improved executive function performance on incongruent trials in COMT-Val158 homozygotes but impaired performance in COMT-Met158 carriers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: