Key result
Physiological feedback effectively regulates emotions, driven by content, modality, and real-time capability.
Why the study?
Previous studies on the specific effects of physiological feedback for emotion regulation have shown conflicting results due to inconsistent study designs.
Does physiological feedback technology improve emotion regulation?
Systematic Review (n=1,364)
Does physiological feedback technology improve emotion regulation?
Physiological feedback is an effective method for real-time emotion regulation, though its efficacy depends on multiple feedback characteristics.
Physiological feedback merits consideration for emotion regulation therapies; extends evidence by clarifying content, authenticity, and modality as key moderators.
Background: Previous studies suggest that physiological feedback can be an effective method for emotion regulation (ER). However, studies on the specific effects of physiological feedback have shown conflicting results due to inconsistencies in study designs. Therefore, we present this systematic review to further validate the effectiveness of physiological feedback for ER, clarify its specific effects, as well as summarize the factors that influence its effectiveness. Method: This systematic review following PRISMA guidelines covers all studies using physiological feedback in emotions. A literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, PsychINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANFANG DATA. And a standardized quality assessment was performed. Results: We identified 27 relevant articles (25 studies), and the majority of these studies showed a significant regulatory effect of physiological feedback on different emotions. The feedback's content, explanation, authenticity, real-time capability, and modality were the key factors that influenced its effects, and this technology will achieve its optimal ER effect when these factors are considered comprehensively. Conclusions: These findings further confirmed the effectiveness of physiological feedback as an ER method, as well as providing key factors that should be addressed in its application. Meanwhile, due to the limitations of these studies, more well-designed studies are still needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Emotion regulation (n=1,364). Physiological feedback vs. No feedback or sham feedback was evaluated on Emotion regulation effectiveness. Physiological feedback demonstrated a significant regulatory effect on different emotions across the majority of the 25 included studies, with effectiveness influenced by feedback content, explanation, authenticity, real-time capability, and modality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: