Key result
HIIT lowers RV systolic pressure and hypertrophy versus continuous training in a PAH rat model.
Why the study?
Exercise benefits pulmonary arterial hypertension but shows little effect on elevated pulmonary pressures or maladaptive RV hypertrophy, and high-intensity interval training had not been tested for PAH.
Does high-intensity interval training improve hemodynamics and right ventricular hypertrophy in a rat model of pulmonary hypertension compared to continuous exercise training?
Does high-intensity interval training improve hemodynamics and right ventricular hypertrophy in a rat model of pulmonary hypertension compared to continuous exercise training?
In a rat model of pulmonary hypertension, high-intensity interval training, but not continuous exercise training, improves hemodynamics and reverses maladaptive right ventricular hypertrophy.
May warrant HIIT investigation in human PAH trials; leaves open translation beyond rodent models.
Exercise is beneficial in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), although studies to date indicate little effect on the elevated pulmonary pressures or maladaptive right ventricle (RV) hypertrophy associated with the disease. For chronic left ventricle failure, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) promotes greater endothelial stimulation and superior benefit than customary continuous exercise training (CExT); however, HIIT has not been tested for PAH. Therefore, here we investigated acute and chronic responses to HIIT vs. CExT in a rat model of monocrotaline (MCT)-induced mild PAH. Six weeks of treadmill training (5 times/wk) were performed, as either 30 min HIIT or 60 min low-intensity CExT. To characterize acute hemodynamic responses to the two approaches, novel recordings of simultaneous pulmonary and systemic pressures during running were obtained at pre- and 2, 4, 6, and 8 wk post-MCT using long-term implantable telemetry. MCT-induced decrement in maximal aerobic capacity was ameliorated by both HIIT and CExT, with less pronounced pulmonary vascular remodeling and no increase in RV inflammation or apoptosis observed. Most importantly, only HIIT lowered RV systolic pressure, RV hypertrophy, and total pulmonary resistance, and prompted higher cardiac index that was complemented by a RV increase in the positive inotrope apelin and reduced fibrosis. HIIT prompted a markedly pulsatile pulmonary pressure during running and was associated with greater lung endothelial nitric oxide synthase after 6 wk. We conclude that HIIT may be superior to CExT for improving hemodynamics and maladaptive RV hypertrophy in PAH. HIIT's superior outcomes may be explained by more favorable pulmonary vascular endothelial adaptation to the pulsatile HIIT stimulus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2016) studied pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Continuous exercise training (CExT) (60 min low-intensity, 5 times/wk) was evaluated on RV systolic pressure, RV hypertrophy, and total pulmonary resistance. High-intensity interval training, but not continuous training, lowered right ventricular systolic pressure, right ventricular hypertrophy, and total pulmonary resistance in a rat model of PAH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: