Key result
Radical pericardiectomy cuts CVP ~42% and alleviates right heart failure in an effusive constrictive pericarditis case.
Why the study?
Early diagnosis, treatment strategy, and prognostic predictors of effusive constrictive pericarditis remain challenging due to sophisticated clinical situations.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case highlights the successful use of radical pericardiectomy in a complex case of idiopathic effusive constrictive pericarditis with multiple complications.
Rare idiopathic ECP case illustrates diagnostic challenges; leaves open optimal management strategies pending further evidence.
IntroductionEffusive constrictive pericarditis (ECP) is a unique clinical syndrome that is characterized by the coexistence of pericardial effusion and constrictive pericardium. The etiology of ECP usually contains tuberculosis, idiopathic, and neoplastic causes. The early diagnosis, treatment strategy and prognostic predictor of ECP still remain a big problem nowadays due to the sophisticated clinical situations. Case PresentationWe here report a rare case of idiopathic ECP with thickened adherent visceral pericardium and normal parietal pericardium, accompanying multiple complications mainly comprising severe tricuspid regurgitation, hypoproteinemia, and proximal deep venous thrombosis. The patient was referred for radical pericardiectomy successfully, but the long-term prognosis may be unfavorable. DiscussionThis case aims to provide some clinical experience of such situation in which the clinician should weight the benefits and the risks to a particular patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Idiopathic Effusive Constrictive Pericarditis (n=1). Radical pericardiectomy was evaluated on Clinical improvement. Radical pericardiectomy successfully reduced central venous pressure from 330 to 190 mmH2O and alleviated symptoms of right heart failure in a patient with idiopathic effusive constrictive pericarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: