Why the study?
Obesity is associated with higher morbidity and death in cardiac surgery, and the use of mini-sternotomy for AVR remains controversial in this population.
Does partial upper sternotomy improve postoperative outcomes compared to median sternotomy in morbidly obese patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=40)
No
Does partial upper sternotomy improve postoperative outcomes compared to median sternotomy in morbidly obese patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement?
Mini-sternotomy is a safe and effective alternative to median sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in morbidly obese patients, offering faster recovery despite longer operative times.
May support mini-sternotomy for faster recovery in obese AVR; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Background: Obesity is linked to higher morbidity and death in cardiac surgery, and mini sternotomy is an established approach for aortic valve surgery (AVR). However, the use of this approach is still controversial in this group of patients. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of this technique in this population. Patients and Methods: From June 2019 to June 2022, 40 morbid obese patients (body mass index ≥ 40) underwent isolated AVR surgery at the National Heart Institute. The surgical approach was median sternotomy (20 patients) and partial upper sternotomy (20 patients). Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were gathered and analyzed. Results: Patients treated with mini sternotomy AVR had reduced post-operative ventilation time (p= 0.0001), less blood drainage (p= 0.0001), and a lower need for blood transfusion (p= 0.03). They also presented advantages in terms of shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay (p= 0.0001). However, the operative, cross-clamp, and bypass times were significantly longer (p= 0.0001) in the minimally invasive group, which can be dramatically reduced with the introduction of sutureless valves. Inotropic support, pacemaker requirement, cerebrovascular accidents, and wound infection were observed and compared between the two groups. Conclusion: Ministernotomy approach is safe for obese patients undergoing surgical AVR, offering them less biological insult and reduced incidence of postoperative complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girgis et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Morbid obesity requiring aortic valve replacement (n=40). Partial upper sternotomy vs. Median sternotomy was evaluated on Post-operative ventilation time, blood drainage, and hospital stay (p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: