The paper is concerned with randomized experiments with one treatment. Two randomization schemes are considered: randomized pairs and unrestricted randomization. If effective at all, the treatment is supposed to affect the conditional distribution of the “experimental” variable Y given another variable X, called “predictor”. The distribution of X is not affected by the treatment. Using the general theory published elsewhere, the paper deduces the locally asymptotically optimal test of the hypothesis that the treatment has no effect. Apart from the usual difficulties connected with asymptotic tests (how large must N be?), the theory is easily applicable in many “live” cases even though the conditional distribution of Y given X may contain nuisance parameters and be of unusual form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neyman et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: