Purpose: This study aimed to explore whether the outcome of professional football matches is affected by changes in intra-team movement synchronization. Methods: Positional data from 77 players were collected during 4 matches of an English Premier League team, using the ProZone® tracking system. Intra-team movement synchronization was calculated using the relative phase of all possible pairing combinations of outfield teammates (dyads) and quantified by the overall percentage of time spent near-in-phase (−30º to 30º bin). Per each displacement axis, a 2 × 2 mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the overall dyadic movement synchronization according to the team and the match final outcome. A two-way ANOVA was used to compare movement synchronization according to dyads’ on-field position (defensive or offensive) and match final outcome. Results: Despite individual dynamical trends during each match, the analysed team tended to exhibit lower movement synchronization when losing. Also, dyads with an emphasis in defensive roles seem to present a more synchronized behaviour during the match than dyads with more offensive roles. Conclusions: Findings suggest that movement synchronization may serve as a tactical performance indicator candidate, reflecting the dynamical interaction between teammates and opponents during the match.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Folgado et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: