Why the study?
In transcatheter interventions, the inability of the implanter to palpate cardiac anatomy limits device sizing and delivery in the absence of an open-surgical field.
3D printing and modeling provide valuable simulation and planning tools for transcatheter structural heart interventions where direct anatomical palpation is not possible.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pantelic et al. (2019) conducted a review in Structural heart disease. 3D printing and 3D modeling was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: