Key result
12-lead ECG screening detects life-threatening cardiac pathology with 100% sensitivity versus the AHA questionnaire.
Why the study?
The debate over ECG screening of young athletes has been ongoing and recommendations vary widely.
Does 12-lead ECG screening improve the detection of life-threatening cardiac pathology compared to the AHA 14-point questionnaire in young students?
Observational (n=2,604)
Does 12-lead ECG screening improve the detection of life-threatening cardiac pathology compared to the AHA 14-point questionnaire in young students?
12-lead ECG screening demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than the standard AHA 14-point questionnaire for detecting life-threatening cardiac pathology in young students.
May warrant further evaluation of ECG screening in students; leaves open outcome impact before practice change.
Background: Sudden cardiac death in young athletes is a devastating event unparalleled in the sports community. The debate over electrocardiogram (ECG) screening of young athletes has been ongoing for many years and recommendations vary widely. Objective: We prospectively studied students in coastal Alabama to compare the detection rate of life-threatening cardiac pathology using a 12-lead ECG vs a preparticipation questionnaire. Methods: A total of 2604 students in coastal Alabama aged 5-22 years (median age, 15 years) were included between 2014 and 2019. They completed the American Heart Association (AHA) 14-point preparticipation questionnaire and underwent a 12-lead ECG. Results: Of participants answering the questionnaire, 60.2% were men, 81.4% were White, and 10.7% were Black. There were 306 (11.9%) of 2565 students who reported symptoms that would have triggered referral to a cardiologist, with the most common (88.2%) being chest pain, shortness of breath, and palpitations. Of 2604 ECGs, 86 (3.3%) were abnormal, with the most frequent findings (54.7%) being T wave inversions and pathologic Q waves. The AHA screening questionnaire had a sensitivity of 33.0% and specificity of 78.7%, while the ECG screening had 100% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity. Three students (0.1%) were found to have conditions associated with sudden cardiac arrest which were detected by ECG, although only 1 of these students reported symptoms on the questionnaire which would have prompted a referral. Conclusion: The 14-point AHA questionnaire raised suspicion for unnecessary referrals while missing 66.0% of the life-threatening pathologies detected with ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McLendon et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Sudden cardiac death risk (n=2,604). 12-lead ECG vs. AHA 14-point preparticipation questionnaire was evaluated on Detection of life-threatening cardiac pathology (sensitivity). 12-lead ECG screening demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity for detecting life-threatening cardiac pathology, compared to 33.0% and 78.7% for the AHA questionnaire.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: