Key result
The authors hypothesize that the Glasgow Prognostic Score could differentiate the odds of developing surgical site infections from remote infections following colorectal cancer surgery.
Why the study?
Can the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) differentiate the odds of developing surgical site infections from remote infections following colorectal cancer surgery?
Can the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) differentiate the odds of developing surgical site infections from remote infections following colorectal cancer surgery?
This letter suggests that the Glasgow Prognostic Score might be useful in differentiating the risk of surgical site infections versus remote infections after colorectal cancer surgery.
We read with interest the recent article indicating that a preoperative systemic inflammatory response is an underlying host characteristic that predisposes to postoperative infection in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. In this article, the Glasgow group found that elevated C-reactive protein together with low albumin levels (Glasgow prognostic score, GPS) were the only host-associated factors that had a high predictive value, which included 40% of patients affected by postoperative infectious complications ( Moyes et al, 2009 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miki et al. (2009) conducted a letter in Colorectal cancer. Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) was evaluated. The authors hypothesize that the Glasgow Prognostic Score could differentiate the odds of developing surgical site infections from remote infections following colorectal cancer surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: