Key result
Multinational survey reveals regional differences in PFO closure approaches, including ECG monitoring and intraoperative imaging.
Why the study?
Firm guidelines do not cover many aspects of PFO-related patient care, leading to disparate clinical approaches in the real world.
Cross-Sectional (n=71)
Yes
There is a vast spectrum of opinions and significant regional differences in the clinical approach to PFO closure, highlighting the need for systematic data to standardize management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regional PFO practice variation persists; leaves open the need for prospective data to standardize care.
Dębski et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) management (n=71). Survey on clinical approach to PFO management was evaluated on Clinical approach to diagnose, treat, and follow-up patients with PFO-related left circulation thromboembolism. A multinational survey of 71 cardiologists demonstrated significant regional differences in the clinical approach to PFO closure, including ECG monitoring duration and intraoperative imaging use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: