Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Despite popularity of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in glaucoma studies, it’s unclear how well OCT-derived metrics compare to traditional measures of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) abundance. Here, Diversity Outbred (J:DO) mice are used to directly compare ganglion cell complex (GCC)-thickness measured by OCT to metrics of retinal anatomy measured ex vivo with retinal wholemounts or optic nerve cross sections. Methods J:DO mice ( n = 48) underwent OCT and fundoscopic exams, with GCC-thickness measured using automated segmentation. Following euthanasia, RGC axons were quantified from para-phenylenediamine-stained optic nerve cross sections and RGC somas from BRN3A-immunolabeled retinal wholemounts with total cellularity assessed by TO-PRO or hematoxylin nuclear staining. Results J:DO tissues lacked overt disease. GCC-thickness (62.4 ± 3.7 µm), RGC abundance (3,097 ± 515 BRN3A + nuclei/mm 2 ; 45,533 ± 9,077 axons), and total inner retinal cell abundance (6,952 ± 810 nuclei/mm 2 ) varied broadly. GCC-thickness correlated significantly to RGC somal density (r = 0.46) and axon number (r = 0.49), whereas total inner retinal cellularity did not. Retinal area (20.3 ± 2.4 mm 2 ) and optic nerve (0.09 ± 0.02 mm 2 ) cross-sectional area varied widely. Sex did not significantly influence any of these metrics. In bilateral comparisons, GCC-thickness (r = 0.89), inner retinal cellularity (r = 0.47), and RGC axon abundance (r = 0.72) all correlated significantly. Conclusions Amongst outbred mice with widely variable phenotypes, OCT-derived measurements of GCC thickness correlate significantly to RGC abundance and axon number. The extensive phenotypic variability exhibited by J:DO mice make them a powerful resource for studies of retinal anatomy using quantitative genetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedberg‐Buenz et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: