Key result
Pacemaker implantation via persistent left superior vena cava poses technical challenges and risks lead dislodgement.
Case Report (n=1)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Permanent pacemaker implantation through a persistent left superior vena cava is technically challenging and prone to complications such as lead dislodgement.
A 55 year old male presented to us with history of recurrent episodes of syncope following which he was detected to have sick sinus syndrome and was planned for a permanent pacemaker implantation. During the procedure he was incidentally detected to have a persistent left superior venacava with absent right superior venacava as probably his initial echocardiogram was overlooked and the procedure was replanned to a later date. A 64 slice MDCT scan was done to delineate the venacaval and great arterial relationship which confirmed a persistent left superior venacava with absent right superior venacava. We planned to proceed with a permanent pacemaker implantation (VVI) with active fixation through the left subclavian vein following which he had a lead dislodgement on the 7th post procedure day. The pacemaker lead was later repositioned in a more stable position with a smaller loop and he is doing well on follow up. Permanent pacemaker implantation through a persistent left superior venacava is a technically challenging procedure and prone for complications and hence the importance of this case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nair et al. (2017) conducted a case report in Sick sinus syndrome with persistent left superior venacava and absent right superior venacava (n=1). Permanent pacemaker implantation (VVI) was evaluated. Permanent pacemaker implantation through a persistent left superior venacava is technically challenging and prone to complications, as demonstrated by a lead dislodgement requiring repositioning.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: