Selecting solvents for polymeric materials is challenging because the target solute is rarely a single well-defined molecular species, but rather a system with chemical, physical, and formulation complexity. To address this issue, this short review compares two “inverse-method” workflows in which solvent-screening data are used to reconstruct effective descriptors of such ill-defined solutes. Hansen solubility parameters (HSP) provide a pragmatic representation of solubility by translating solvent-screening data into a spherical compatibility domain, but their predictive scope remains constrained by the “like dissolves like” paradigm.. COSMO-RS backfitting, a largely overlooked inverse extension of COSMO-RS, uses the same experimental logic to reconstruct an effective σ-profile, enabling solvent ranking in a thermodynamic framework without requiring an explicit polymer structure. Using cellulose triacetate as a stringent benchmark, the review shows that the two approaches are best viewed as sequentially complementary: HSP provides a first operational and visually intuitive map, whereas COSMO-RS backfitting offers greater predictive value for ranking new pure solvents when geometric similarity is no longer sufficiently discriminating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aubry et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: