Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Four supposedly T-independent antigens, fluorescein (FLU)-E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), FLU-Brucella abortus (FLU-BA), FLU-Ficoll, and FLU-polymerized flagellin (FLU-POL), were tested for their capacity to stimulate B cell proliferation and antibody formation. Single, isolated FLU-specific adult murine splenic B lymphocytes were used as the unequivocal target cell in 10-microliter cultures unsupported by accessory, feeder or filler cells. The stimulatory capacity of four supposed mitogens, LPS, dextran sulfate (DXS), BA, and Ficoll, and of one T-dependent antigen, FLU-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (FLU-KLH), was also studied. Stimuli were used over a wide range of concentrations with or without added T cell-derived, antigen-nonspecific factors promoting B cell growth and differentiation (BGDA). The results allowed triggering stimuli to be divided into four groups: 1) FLU-KLH failed to stimulate single B cells even in the presence of BGDA as did unconjugated Ficoll; 2) FLU-POL was stimulatory only when BGDA was also present, as was unconjugated BA; 3) FLU-BA was slightly stimulatory in the absence of BGDA, but much more so in the presence of BGDA, as was a low concentration of LPS; 4) FLU-LPS and FLU-Ficoll were powerfully stimulatory over a 100,000-fold range of concentrations, and at no concentration did BGDA affect their capacity. LPS or LPS + DXS at high concentrations behaved similarly. The differing behavior of the various conjugates did not correlate either with their supposed "TI-1" or "TI-2" status or with the mitogenic properties of the carrier portion of the antigen. For example, FLU-Ficoll at 0.01 microgram/ml caused 28% of FLU-specific B cells to form proliferating clones, 70% of which secreted immunoglobulin, but a 1000-fold higher concentration of Ficoll failed to stimulate single cells. It is tempting to regard stimuli in group 4 as truly T-independent. However, the intentional addition of thymus filler cells to single B cells triggered by these agents markedly raised antibody formation. Until the nature of this further "helper" effect is understood, it would be unwise to ignore the possibility that T cells or accessory cells are involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pike et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: