Key result
Metabolic syndrome linked to ~10-fold higher NT-proBNP levels versus controls.
Why the study?
The relationship of NT-proBNP levels with metabolic syndrome components and left ventricular function in patients with metabolic syndrome was not well characterized.
Case-Control (n=148)
NT-proBNP levels are significantly elevated in patients with metabolic syndrome and correlate with diastolic dysfunction severity, suggesting its utility as a marker for early cardiac disorders.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated NT-proBNP may signal subclinical cardiac dysfunction in metabolic syndrome; cross-sectional data leave its biomarker utility unproven.
Aim. To study the relationship of NT-proBNP level with metabolic sindrome (MS) components and values of diastolic and systolic functions of the LV in patients with MS. Material and methods. Totally 148 patients studied. The main group consisted of 100 persons with MS, controls were 48 persons without MS. The participants underwent anthropometry, BP measurement, glucose level measurement, lipid spectrum, NT-proBNP levels and also ECG and EchoCG recording. MS and its components were evaluated according to IDF (2005). Results. MS patients had higher level of NT-proBNP than controls (246,5±35,3 pg/ml vs 24,33±4,7 pg/ml, p<0,0001). It was shown that the diameter of LA (P=0,766, p=0,001), IVST (P=0,29, p=0,04), ОТ (Р=-0,217, p=0,039) and level of TG (P=-0,22, p=0,04) are independent factors related to NT-proBNP. With an increase of diastolic dysfunction LV severity the level of NT-proBNP also increased. Conclusion. NT-proBNP reveals the patients with early cardial disorders among persons with MS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Либис et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Metabolic syndrome (n=148). Metabolic syndrome vs. Controls without metabolic syndrome was evaluated on NT-proBNP level (p=<0.0001). Metabolic syndrome was associated with significantly higher NT-proBNP levels compared to controls (246.5 vs 24.33 pg/ml, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: