Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A 3-yr study was conducted on Black and Gray Wooded soils at five different sites in the Aspen Parkland of Saskatchewan to determine the effect of spiking, burning, mowing, deep-banding (Trt) and applications of N, P, K and S liquid and granular fertilizers (Fert) on dry matter yield (DMY) and forage quality of primarily smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) pastures. Fertilizer application was a liquid form blended to provide 100 kg N ha–1, 45 kg P2O5 ha–1, 23 kg K2O ha–1 and 12 kg S ha–1 in 350 kg of fertilizer ha–1. The experimental design at each site was a randomized complete block in a split-plot arrangement. Main plots were spike, burn, mow, deep-band, deep-band liquid fertilizer and control. The split-plot treatment was granular fertilizer broadcast at 0 and 350 kg ha−1 (providing 100 kg N ha−1, 45 kg P2O5 ha−1, 23 kg K2O ha–1 and 12 kg S ha−1). All treatments were applied in the spring of 1994. Interaction effects of Trt × Yr and Fert × Yr were significant (P < 0.05) indicating a wide range of response to the rejuvenation methods among years. Spiking reduced (P < 0.05) DMY in year 1 at two sites. Deep-banding and mowing increased (P < 0.05) DMY at one site in year 3. Burning increased (P < 0.05) DMY in years 1 and 2 only at the Gray Wooded soil site. In year 1, liquid plus granular fertilizer (200 kg N ha–1) [deep-banded liquid fertilizer (DBLIQ at 100 kg N ha−1) + broadcast fertilizer (+F at 100 kg N ha−1] increased DMY at all sites by 84 to 185% over control plots. This effect carried over (P < 0.05) into year 2 at four sites but not the third and final year. The high rate of N (200 kg N ha−1) of the DBLIQ + F almost doubled (P < 0.05) crude protein content of year 1 forage, 170.3 g kg−1 compared with 96.4 g kg–1 for control. It was concluded that an application of broadcast or liquid fertilizer alone or combined with mechanical treatments will produce a significant effect on herbage yield and quality but only in the short term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lardner et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: