UPLIFT (Understanding Potential Long-Term Improvements in Function with Tiotropium), a 4-yr trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, allowed for assessment of smoking status on long-term responses to maintenance bronchodilator therapy. 5,993 patients were randomised (tiotropium/placebo). Lung function, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, exacerbations and adverse events were followed. Patients were characterised as continuing smokers (CS), continuing ex-smokers (CE), or intermittent smokers (IS) based on self-reporting smoking behaviour. 60%, 14% and 26% of patients were CE, CS and IS, respectively. The rate of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) decline for placebo patients was most rapid in CS (-52+/-4, -37+/2 and -23+/2 mL.yr(-1) in CS, IS, and CE, respectively). Tiotropium did not alter FEV(1) decline, but was associated with significant improvements in pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV(1) over placebo that persisted throughout the 4-yr trial for each smoking status (pre-bronchodilator: 127, 55 and 97 mL at 48 months in CS, IS and CE, respectively; p< or =0.0003). Tiotropium reduced exacerbation risk in CS (HR (95% CI) 0.80 (0.67-0.95)), in CE (0.85 (0.79-0.92)) and trended towards significance in IS (0.89 (0.79-1.00)). At 4 yrs, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for tiotropium patients improved the most in CS (-4.63 units, p = 0.0006) and the least in IS (-0.60 units, p = 0.51), [corrected] compared with control. Tiotropium provided long-term benefits irrespective of smoking status, although differences among categories were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tashkin et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: