Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Production of animal protein is associated with high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Globally, oyster aquaculture is increasing as a way to meet growing demands for protein, yet its associated GHG-emissions are largely unknown. We quantified oyster aquaculture GHG-emissions from the three main constituents of GHG-release associated with terrestrial livestock production: fermentation in the animal gut, manure management, and fodder production. We found that oysters release no methane (CH 4 ) and only negligible amounts of nitrous oxide (0.00012 ± 0.00004 μmol N 2 O gDW –1 hr –1 ) and carbon dioxide (3.556 ± 0.471 μmol CO 2 gDW –1 hr –1 ). Further, sediment fluxes of N 2 O and CH 4 were unchanged in the presence of oyster aquaculture, regardless of the length of time it had been in place. Sediment CO 2 release was slightly stimulated between 4 and 6 years of aquaculture presence and then returned to baseline levels but was not significantly different between aquaculture and a control site when all ages of culture were pooled. There is no GHG-release from oyster fodder production. Considering the main drivers of GHG-release in terrestrial livestock systems, oyster aquaculture has less than 0.5% of the GHG-cost of beef, small ruminants, pork, and poultry in terms of CO 2 -equivalents per kg protein, suggesting that shellfish aquaculture may provide a a low GHG alternative for future animal protein production compared to land based sources. We estimate that if 10% of the protein from beef consumption in the United States was replaced with protein from oysters, the GHG savings would be equivalent to 10.8 million fewer cars on the road.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: