Key result
Boiled beef ingestion yields an estimated creatinine renal clearance of ~7.6 L/h in healthy men.
Why the study?
Does ingestion of 225 g boiled beef alter creatinine pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy male volunteers?
Does ingestion of 225 g boiled beef alter creatinine pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy male volunteers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A population pharmacokinetic model successfully described creatinine kinetics with and without a cooked meat meal, providing a basis for further studies on glomerular filtration rate assessment.
A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for creatinine was successfully developed using creatinine concentration data from 6 healthy male volunteers with and without ingestion of 225 g boiled beef as an exogenous creatinine source. A model with first-order absorption, zero-order creatinine generation, and first-order elimination was used to describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) data. Creatinine parameters, estimated from the final model were: apparent absorption rate constant (Ka, 1.71 1/h), lag time (0.343 h), renal clearance (equal to systemic clearance) (CL, 7.57 L/h), apparent volume of distribution (Vd, 52.8 L), and creatinine generation rate (CGR, 67.8 mg/h). The CL and CGR estimates were in agreement with the reported values, whereas the Vd estimates were slightly higher than the reported values. The model is a useful starting point for further experimental approaches to improve the understanding of creatinine kinetics, which may involve creatinine “dosing” accompanied by independent methods to assess the glomerular filtration rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) studied Healthy volunteers (n=6). Boiled beef vs. Without ingestion was evaluated on Creatinine pharmacokinetic parameters. A population pharmacokinetic model for creatinine developed from 6 healthy men ingesting 225 g boiled beef estimated a renal clearance of 7.57 L/h and volume of distribution of 52.8 L.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: