Key result
Severe preoperative disability in spondylolisthesis surgery is linked to ~54% greater achievement of clinically meaningful improvement.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the influence of preoperative disability on patient-reported outcomes following surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Does severe preoperative disability (ODI ≥ 41) influence patient-reported outcomes following surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis compared to milder disability (ODI < 41)?
Cohort (n=214)
No
Does severe preoperative disability (ODI ≥ 41) influence patient-reported outcomes following surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis compared to milder disability (ODI < 41)?
Patients with severe preoperative disability report greater improvements in mental health and disability following surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis compared to those with milder disability.
Severe disability may predict greater surgical benefit; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before changing selection.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preoperative disability's influence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). METHODS: DS patients who underwent surgical intervention were retrospectively identified from a single-surgeon spine registry. Cohorts based on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) < 41 (milder disability) and ≥ 41 (severe disability) were created. Demographic differences were accounted for with 1:1 propensity score matching. For the matched sample, perioperative and PRO data were additionally collected. PROs assessed included mental health, physical function, pain, and disability. Pre- and up to 2-year postoperative PROs were utilized. Average time to final follow-up was 15.7 ± 8.8 months. Improvements in PROs and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rates were calculated. Continuous variables were compared through Student t-test and categorical variables were compared through chi-square tests. RESULTS: Altogether, 214 patients were included with 77 in the milder disability group. The severe disability group had worse postoperative day (POD) 1 pain scores and longer hospital stays (p ≤ 0.038, both). The severe disability group reported worse outcomes pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.011, all), but had greater average improvement in 12-item Short Form health survey mental composite score (SF-12 MCS), 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), visual analogue scale (VAS)-back, and ODI by 6 weeks (p ≤ 0.037, all) and PHQ-9, VAS-back and ODI by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.015, all). The severe disability cohort was more likely to achieve MCID for SF-12 MCS, PHQ-9, and ODI (p ≤ 0.003, all). CONCLUSION: Patients with greater baseline disability report higher POD 1 pain and discharge later than patients with milder disability. While these patients report inferior physical/mental health before and after surgery, they report greater improvements in mental health and disability postoperatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khosla et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Degenerative spondylolisthesis (n=214). Severe preoperative disability (Oswestry Disability Index ≥ 41) vs. Milder preoperative disability (Oswestry Disability Index < 41) was evaluated on Achievement of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (p=<0.001). Patients with severe preoperative disability undergoing surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis achieved significantly higher rates of minimal clinically important difference in disability (74.0% vs 47.9%) compared to those with milder disability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: