On the problem of trap‐response types of small mammal populations

Conclusions So far as the population data thus far amassed go, commensal rats in residential habitats are of type II; house mice may be of type I or III in fields but might show type II in residences, and fieral species or subspecies may range from type I to III. Altogether alloresponsive populations seem to be much commoner than the isoresponsive. It is as yet little disclosed to what degree the differentiation of the type is correlated with speciation or subspeciation, even if only a proof that a subspecific population would hold type III as its fixed feature is given. The response types are supposed to be associated with the levels of population shyness. Hence some characters reflected in those may possibly be connected with sexual isolation provoking speciation. Some awkward respects due to the heterogeneous trappability, depending upon the trap‐response type, among a mixed population of marked and unmarked animals have been confirmed regarding the methodology for estimating parameters.