Solithromycin, a fourth-generation macrolide (a fluoroketolide with enhanced activity against macrolide-resistant bacteria due to interaction with three ribosomal sites) and the first fluoroketolide, was tested against a 2014 collection of 6,115 isolates, including Streptococcus pneumoniae (1,713 isolates), Haemophilus influenzae (1,308), Moraxella catarrhalis (577), Staphylococcus aureus (1,024), and beta-hemolytic streptococci (1,493), by reference broth microdilution methods. The geographic samples included 2,748 isolates from the United States, 2,536 from Europe, 386 from Latin America, and 445 from the Asia-Pacific region. Solithromycin was observed to be very active against S. pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 0.008/0.12 μg/ml), demonstrating 2-fold greater activity than telithromycin (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.25 μg/ml) and 16- to >256-fold greater activity than azithromycin (MIC50/90, 0.12/>32 μg/ml), with all strains being inhibited at a solithromycin MIC of ≤1 μg/ml. Against H. influenzae, solithromycin showed potency identical to that of telithromycin (MIC50/90, 1/2 μg/ml), and both of these compounds were 2-fold less active than azithromycin (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml). All but one of the M. catarrhalis isolates were inhibited by solithromycin at ≤0.25 μg/ml. Solithromycin inhibited 85.3% of S. aureus isolates at ≤1 μg/ml, and its activity was lower against methicillin-resistant (MIC50/90, 0.06/>32 μg/ml) than against methicillin-susceptible (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 μg/ml) isolates. Little variation in solithromycin activity was observed by geographic region for the species tested. Solithromycin was very active against beta-hemolytic streptococci (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.03 μg/ml), and all isolates were inhibited at MIC values of ≤0.5 μg/ml. In conclusion, solithromycin demonstrated potent activity against global and contemporary (2014) pathogens that represent the major causes of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. These data support the continued clinical development of solithromycin for the treatment of this important indication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farrell et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: