Analysis of five empirical solvent polarity scales ETN, π*, Py, S′ and SPP is carried out by correlating them with Π and σ2tot, two computed quantities derived from molecular surface electrostatic potentials. Our results indicate (i) that the S′ scale should be a good global solvent polarity scale, (ii) that it would be inappropriate to use the ETN and Py scales to describe non-specific solute–solvent interactions for protic solvents, and (iii) that the π* and SPP scales are probably contaminated with charge-transfer effects for aromatic and polychlorinated solvents. The differences between our results and those obtained by the correlation of empirical scales with a theoretical thermodynamic analysis result (EPNA) are discussed in the context of intermolecular interactions between the probe solutes and the solvent considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zou et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: