Key result
ERAS protocol linked to a ~7-day shorter hospital stay versus conventional care.
Why the study?
This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery.
Does the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduce length of hospital stay and improve recovery in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery?
Cohort (n=88)
No
Does the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduce length of hospital stay and improve recovery in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery?
Implementation of an ERAS protocol for upper gastrointestinal surgery significantly reduced length of hospital stay, accelerated recovery, and lowered hospitalization costs without increasing complications.
ERAS may shorten stays after upper GI surgery without added complications; extends prior data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol has been shown to reduce recovery period and postoperative complications.This prospective study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of ERAS in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery.Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for benign or malignant diseases of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction, or stomach during October 2018-December 2019 were included.Outcomes compared between ERAS and conventional care (CC) included length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, mortality, recovery, and hospitalization cost.Results: Eighty-eight (32 ERAS, 56 CC) patients were included.ERAS had shorter LOS (5.5 vs. 12.5 days, p<0.001), earlier time to toleration of oral soft diet (3 vs. 8 days, p<0.001), faster time to first defecation (71.6 vs. 114.5 hours, p<0.001), early ambulation (43.8 vs. 84.6 hours, p=0.010), and reduced hospitalization cost (197,140 vs. 256,315 Thai baht, p<0.032).C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 1 was significantly lower in ERAS patients (61.3 vs. 87.9mg/L, p=0.027).BMI recovery occurred within 3 and 6 months in ERAS and CC, respectively.There was no significant difference in surgery-related or nonsurgery-related complications between groups.No mortality was observed.Conclusions: In a UGI surgical setting, ERAS accelerated recovery, reduced LOS, and lowered hospitalization cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parakonthun et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Upper gastrointestinal diseases requiring surgery (n=88). Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Conventional care was evaluated on Total length of hospital stay (LOS) (p=<0.001). The Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol significantly reduced the median length of hospital stay to 5.5 days compared to 12.5 days with conventional care (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: