Application of alkaline fly ash to soils is expected to result in an increase in B sorption capacity. If fly ash is B‐rich, B phytotoxicity might occur depending not only on B loads and magnitude of soil sorption capacity for B, but also on the strength of B retention by sorption surfaces of the fly ash amended soils. This strength determines the ease through which B releases into the soil solution. Aged‐alkaline fly ash was applied to one calcareous and two acid soils at rates equal to 0, 5, 20, and 50 g kg−1 of soil, and the impact of fly ash addition on B sorption in these soils was characterized, by means of the parameters (affinity and maximum) obtained through fitting B sorption data to the nonlinear Freundlich, Langmuir isotherms, and the phenomenological equation of Keren et al. Boron was added to the untreated and the fly ash‐treated soils, left in contact for 30 d, and its desorbability was studied. It was observed that although B sorption maximum of soils tended to increase upon fly ash addition, the affinity of B to sorption sites remained practically unaltered in most of the cases. Boron sorption was an exothermic reaction and the greatest part (more than 60%) of sorbed B in the fly ash‐treated soils could be easily desorbed within 24 h, reaching 80% for the acid soils and 100% for the calcareous soil after 120 h of desorption time. It was concluded that although there was a tendency of an increase in B sorption capacity in most cases upon fly ash addition, this increase was not generally accompanied by an increase in strength of B retention by soil surfaces. A major part of added B in the fly ash‐treated soils remained labile enough to be released in the soil solution in a short time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsi et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: