Addition of an Escherichia coli 50S subunit (50S(Cy5)) containing a Cy5-labeled L11 N-terminal domain (L11-NTD) within the GTPase-associated center (GAC) to an E. coli 30S initiation complex (30SIC(Cy3)) containing Cy3-labeled initiation factor 2 complexed with GTP leads to rapid development of a FRET signal during formation of the 70S initiation complex (70SIC). Initiation factor 2 (IF2) and elongation factor G (EF-G) induce similar changes in ribosome structure. Here we show that such similarities are maintained on a dynamic level as well. Thus, movement of IF2 toward L11-NTD after initial 70S ribosome formation follows GTP hydrolysis and precedes P(i) release, paralleling movement of EF-G following its binding to the ribosome [Seo, H., et al. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 2504-2514], and in both cases, the rate of such movement is slowed if GTP hydrolysis is prevented. The 30SIC(Cy3):50S(Cy5) FRET signal also provides a sensitive probe of the ability of initiation factor 3 to discriminate between a canonical and a noncanonical initiation codon during 70SIC formation. We employ Bacillus stearothermophilus IF2 as a substitute for E. coli IF2 to take advantage of the higher stability of the complexes it forms with E. coli ribosomes. While Bst-IF2 is fully functional in formation of E. coli 70SIC, relative reactivities toward dipeptide formation of 70SICs formed with the two IF2s suggest that the Bst-IF2.GDP complex is more difficult to displace from the GAC than the E. coli IF2.GDP complex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: