Key result
Prior adjuvant anthracyclines show similar epirubicin and paclitaxel response rates versus chemonaive patients.
Why the study?
Does prior adjuvant chemotherapy impact the response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin/paclitaxel?
Cohort (n=291)
Yes
Does prior adjuvant chemotherapy impact the response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin/paclitaxel?
Odds Ratio: 0.92 (95% CI 0.43–2.01)
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 68%
p-value: p=0.86
Epirubicin/paclitaxel regimens provide satisfactory results in metastatic breast cancer, with efficacy independent of previous adjuvant chemotherapy type.
ET may retain efficacy independent of prior adjuvant chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer; leaves open effects on survival and needs prospective confirmation.
To evaluate the impact of prior adjuvant chemotherapy on response rate (RR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin/paclitaxel (ET) regimens. In all, 291 patients enrolled in five studies in metastatic breast cancer were analysed: 101 (35%) were chemonaive, 109 (37%) had received adjuvant CMF and 81 (28%) adjuvant anthracyclines. Response rate to ET was 66%. Response rate was 63% for cyclophosphamide plus methotrexate plus 5-fluorouracil (CMF), 67% for prior anthracyclines and 68% in chemonaive patients (P=0.5). By multivariate analysis, adjusted odds ratio for response was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.37-1.79) for CMF and 0.92 (95% CI 0.43-2.01) for anthracyclines (P=0.86). The CR rates were 14% for both CMF and anthracyclines and 22% for chemonaive patients (P=0.2). By multivariate analysis, the relative odds of CR for CMF or anthracyclines were 0.40 and 0.39 as compared to chemonaive patients (P=0.036). The median PFS was 11.0 months for prior CMF, 10.2 months for anthracyclines and 12.5 months in chemonaive patients (P=0.33). In multivariate Cox's model, a nonsignificant increase in the risk of progression was seen in patients treated with adjuvant CMF or anthracyclines. The median OS was 23.8 months for CMF, 20.2 months for anthracyclines and 27.5 months in chemonaive patients (P=0.61). The same, nonsignificant, association was seen in multivariate analysis. The ET regimens provide satisfactory results in metastatic breast cancer, regardless of previous adjuvant chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gennari et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Metastatic breast cancer (n=291). Prior adjuvant anthracyclines vs. Chemonaive was evaluated on Overall response rate (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43-2.01, p=0.86). Prior adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines did not significantly impact the overall response rate to first-line epirubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer compared to chemonaive patients (OR 0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: