Key result
Intraoperative AVP device use during valve-sparing root replacement shows ~92% postoperative AI ≤ grade 1.
Why the study?
Aortic valve repair procedures are technically challenging, and current intraoperative evaluation methods often fail to predict final echocardiographic results.
Does an intraoperative aortic valve visualization and pressurization (AVP) device accurately assess aortic insufficiency and facilitate targeted adjustments in patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacement?
Observational (n=24)
Does an intraoperative aortic valve visualization and pressurization (AVP) device accurately assess aortic insufficiency and facilitate targeted adjustments in patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacement?
The novel AVP device enables intraoperative evaluation of aortic valve repair under physiological conditions on an arrested heart, allowing for targeted surgical adjustments and predictable operative results.
Novel AVP device enables physiological AI assessment during arrest; leaves open impact on repair durability or outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve repair procedures are technically challenging, and current intraoperative evaluation methods often fail to predict the final echocardiographic result. We have developed a novel intraoperative aortic valve visualization and pressurization (AVP) device, enabling valve inspection under physiological conditions, and measuring aortic valve insufficiency (AI) during cardioplegic arrest. METHODS: The AVP device is attached to the (neo)aorta, after any type of aortic valve repair, while the heart is arrested. The root is pressurized (60-80 mmHg) using a saline solution and an endoscope is introduced. The valve is inspected, and the amount of valvular leakage is measured. Postoperative 'gold standard' transesophageal echocardiogram measurements of AI are performed and compared against regurgitation volume measured. RESULTS: In 24 patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacement, the AVP device was used. In 22 patients, postoperative echocardiographic AI was ≤ grade 1. The median leakage was 90 ml/min, IQR 60-120 ml/min. In 3 patients, additional adjustments after visual inspection was performed. In 2 patients, with complex anatomy, the valve was replaced. In one, after evaluation with the device, there was undesirable result visually and residual AI of 330 ml/min, and in another, 260 ml/min residual AI was measured and valve restriction on visual inspection. CONCLUSIONS: The novel AVP device enables intraoperative evaluation of the valve under physiological conditions, while still on arrested heart, and allows for targeted adjustments. The AVP device can be an important aid for intraoperative evaluation of the aortic valve, during valve repair and valve-sparing procedures, thereby making the operative result more predictable and the operation more efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arabkhani et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Aortic valve disease requiring valve-sparing root replacement (n=24). Aortic valve visualization and pressurization (AVP) device was evaluated on Postoperative echocardiographic aortic insufficiency (AI) ≤ grade 1. Intraoperative use of the novel AVP device during valve-sparing root replacement resulted in postoperative echocardiographic aortic insufficiency ≤ grade 1 in 91.7% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: