Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of metal-free organic donor–acceptor (D–A) derivatives ( ME01 – ME06 ) of the known dye C281 were designed using first-principles calculations in order to evaluate their potential for applications in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Their physical and electronic properties were calculated using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT). These include molecular properties that are required to assess the feasibility of a dye to function in DSSCs: UV–vis absorption spectra, light-harvesting efficiency (LHE), and driving forces of electron injection ( Δ G inj ). ME01, ME02, and ME04 are predicted to exhibit broad absorption optical spectra that cover the entire visible range, rendering these three dyes promising DSSC prospects. Device-relevant calculations on these three short-listed dyes and the parent dye C281 were then performed, whereupon the dye molecules were adsorbed onto anatase TiO 2 surfaces to form the DSSC working electrode. Associated DSSC device characteristics of this dye···TiO 2 interfacial structure were determined. These include the light-harvesting efficiency, the number of injected electrons, the electron-injection lifetime, and the quantum-energy alignment of the adsorbed dye molecule to that of its device components. In turn, these calculated parameters enabled the derivation of the DSSC device performance parameters: short-circuit current density, J SC, incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency, IPCE, and open-circuit voltage, V OC . Thus, we demonstrate a systematic ab initio approach to screen rationally designed D–A dyes with respect to their potential applicability in high-performance DSSC devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: