Removal of NO from flue gas may be achieved by its oxidation to NO 2 followed by absorption in sulfite solution in existing scrubbers for desulfurization. Rates of NO 2 absorption and sulfite oxidation were measured in a highly characterized stirred-cell contactor. The results were interpreted by the theory of mass transfer with fast reaction in the boundary layer. The reactions between NO 2 and sulfite (SO 3 2 - ), bisulfite (HSO 3 - ), and thiosulfate (S 2 O 3 2 - ) were first order in NO 2 concentration, and their respective rate constants at 55 °C were 11.2 × 10 5, 2.8 × 10 4, and 5.4 × 10 3 M - 1 s - 1 . The NO 2 hydrolysis reaction was second order in NO 2 concentration, with a rate constant of 1.6 × 10 7 M - 1 s - 1 at 55 °C. NO 2 absorption initiates sulfite oxidation in the presence of oxygen, and this study quantified the effect of sulfite and oxygen concentration, the rate of NO 2 absorption, and the presence of thiosulfate and gas-phase SO 2 on the rate of sulfite oxidation. With typical conditions for limestone slurry, 10 mM total dissolved S(IV) and pH 4−5, the estimated NO 2 removal was less than 50%. Therefore, an acceptable level of NO 2 removal by a conventional limestone slurry scrubber is not probable. However, NO 2 absorption is feasible in sodium sulfite inhibited by thiosulfate. NO 2 may also be an effective catalyst for sulfite oxidation in limestone slurry scrubbing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: