Key result
Dual-reference PAC mapping linked to ~49% lower 24-month recurrence versus single-reference mapping.
Why the study?
Activation mapping of premature atrial complexes is challenging due to interference from mechanical bumping and non-targeted ectopies.
Does a dual-reference approach improve mapping efficacy, instant success, and long-term recurrence compared to a single-reference approach in patients undergoing catheter ablation for PACs with non-PV and non-SVC origins?
Cohort (n=188)
Does a dual-reference approach improve mapping efficacy, instant success, and long-term recurrence compared to a single-reference approach in patients undergoing catheter ablation for PACs with non-PV and non-SVC origins?
The dual-reference approach for activation mapping significantly shortens procedural time and improves both instant and long-term success of catheter ablation for non-PV and non-SVC premature atrial complexes.
May lower recurrence after non-PV PAC ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
AIMS: Activation mapping of premature atrial complexes (PACs) proves challenging due to interference by mechanical bumping and non-targeted ectopies. This study aims to compare the mapping efficacy, instant success, and long-term recurrence of catheter ablation for PACs with non-pulmonary vein (PV) and non-superior vena cava (SVC) origins between the novel dual-reference approach (DRA) and the routine single-reference approach (SRA) of mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PACs, or frequent residual PACs after atrial tachyarrhythmia ablation were enrolled. During activation mapping, the coronary sinus (CS) catheter was used as the only timing reference in the SRA group. In the DRA group, another catheter, which was spatially separated from the CS catheter, was used as the second reference. The timing difference between the two references was used to discriminate the targeted PACs from the uninterested rhythms. Procedural parameters and long-term recurrence were compared. A total of 188 patients (109 in SRA and 79 in DRA) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were similar. Compared with the SRA group, the DRA group had less repeated mapping (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.004), shorter mapping (15 ± 6 vs. 23 ± 7 min, P < 0.001) and procedural time (119 ± 28 vs. 132 ± 22 min, P = 0.001), similar procedural complication rates (3.6 vs. 3.8%, P > 0.999), higher instant success (96.2 vs. 87.2%, P = 0.039), and lower recurrence rate (15.2 vs. 29.3%, hazard ratio 1.943, P = 0.033) during a 24-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: As a novel strategy, the DRA shortens the procedural time and improves both instant and long-term success of PAC ablation, serving as a promising approach in mapping PACs with non-PV and non-SVC origins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Premature atrial complexes (PACs) with non-pulmonary vein and non-superior vena cava origins (n=188). Dual-reference approach (DRA) of mapping vs. Routine single-reference approach (SRA) of mapping was evaluated on Long-term recurrence (HR 1.943, p=0.033). The dual-reference approach for mapping premature atrial complexes yielded a lower 24-month recurrence rate than the single-reference approach (15.2% vs. 29.3%; HR 1.943; P=0.033).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Atrial fibrillationMore from EP Europace