Contactless photoconductance measurements are commonly used to extract the emitter saturation current density (Joe) for crystalline silicon samples containing an emitter on the surface. We review the physics behind the analysis ofJoeand compare the commonly used approximations with more generalised solutions using two‐dimensional device simulations. We quantify errors present in such approximations for different test conditions involving varying illumination conditions and surface properties in samples with the same emitter on both sides. The simulatedJoeobtained from the dark hole current from the emitter into the bulk is nearly the same as the simulatedJoedetermined by photoconductance measurements of thereardiffusion. The simulatedJoeat the front emitter is equivalent to that at the rear emitter only when the sample is subject to a nearly constant and flat generation profile. For illumination conditions including visible light, the simulatedJoeat the front emitter is smaller than the simulatedJoeat the rear emitter. BothJoeat the rear emitter and from the dark hole current in the emitter remain nearly constant over a wide range of base doping densities. The approximations used for the determination ofJoefrom photoconductance measurements makeJoedependent on the excess minority carrier density. Lifetime measurements demonstrate that, even in high‐quality silicon,Joeshould be determined from the analytical solution as a function of excess minority carrier densityincludingShockley‐Read‐Hall recombination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mäckel et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: