Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HE apparent mutation rate depends upon a number of contingencies: the Tprimary error rate, the probability o€ repair, error avoidance by the apparatus of DNA replication, and the probability of detection.The probability of detection of those base pair substitutions which produce an amino acid substitution appears to be highly variable, and presumably reflects the sensitivity of polypeptide functions to small variations in primary structure.Fine-scale mapping has often revealed a highly nonrandom distribution of mutations among sites.In the T4rZZ system, for instance, 809 of the first 1609 independently isolated mutants were observed to map into only two sites (BEN-ZER 1961).Genetic data indicate that the number of rZZ sites capable of mutation by base pair substitution is about 1700 (EDGAR et al. 1962;STAHL, EDGAR and STEINBERG 1964), and this estimate is supported by quasi-chemical measurements (GOLDBERG 1966).When frameshift mutations are excluded from consideration, however, fewer than 3% of these potential sites have been identified (FREESE 1959;BENZER 1961;ORGEL and BRENNER 1961; see Chapter 5 of DRAKE 1970).What then is the nature of the apparently immutable sites?Two possible answers deserve serious consideration: many sites are extremely weakly mutable, or else many amino acid substitutions are undetected in standard screening systems because they fail to exert significantly deleterious effects upon protein function.The first possibility is supported by the observation that
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koch et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: