Key result
Induced AF maintains LV mechanical efficiency comparable to regular beats in normal canine hearts.
Why the study?
The impact of left ventricular arrhythmic contractions during atrial fibrillation on mechanical efficiency was unclear in normal hearts.
Does electrically induced atrial fibrillation reduce left ventricular mechanical efficiency in normal canine hearts?
Does electrically induced atrial fibrillation reduce left ventricular mechanical efficiency in normal canine hearts?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.78% vs 0.8%
p-value: p=>>0.05
In a normal canine model, LV arrhythmia during AF does not directly suppress the mean level of LV mechanical efficiency.
High efficiency in normal canine AF leaves open translation to human disease; hypothesis-generating for LV energetics.
We analyzed the frequency distribution of the left ventricular (LV) mechanical efficiency of individual arrhythmic beats during electrically induced atrial fibrillation (AF) in normal canine hearts. This efficiency is the fraction of the external mechanical work (EW) in the total mechanical energy measured by the systolic pressure-volume area (PVA). The mean, median, and mode of this efficiency (EW/PVA) were as high as 78%, 80%, and 81%, respectively, on average in six hearts. These high efficiencies were comparable to that of the regular beats in these hearts. The frequency distribution of the EW/PVA during AF tended to skew to the higher side in all the hearts. Since the EW/PVA is directly related to both the ventriculo-arterial (or afterload) coupling ratio (E(a)/E(max); E(a) = effective arterial elastance, E(max) = end-systolic ventricular elastance) and the ejection fraction on a per-beat basis, we also analyzed their frequency distributions. We found them to skew enough to account for the rightward skewed frequency distribution of the EW/PVA during AF with the unexpectedly high mean EW/PVA. These results indicate that the LV arrhythmia during AF per se does not directly suppress the mean level of LV mechanical efficiency in normal canine hearts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (2006) studied Normal hearts (electrically induced atrial fibrillation) (n=6). Electrically induced atrial fibrillation vs. Regular left atrial pacing was evaluated on Left ventricular mechanical efficiency (EW/PVA) (p=>>0.05). Left ventricular mechanical efficiency during electrically induced atrial fibrillation remained as high as 78% on average, comparable to the 80% efficiency of regular beats in normal canine hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: