This study sought to determine if a language intervention treatment program could promote the segmentation and combination of grammatical constituents in an individual who primarily communicated via single-symbol message strategies. A computerized adaptation of a reciprocal reading procedure was employed to highlight syntactic constituents through selective segmentation and promote their combination through conversational turn taking. To answer this question, evidence for a treatment effect was obtained using a multiple baseline across communicative contexts design. A 5-year-old child who primarily communicated via single-symbol message strategies was trained to segment syntactic constituents in two different discourse contexts (book reading and structured discourse). The data for this child indicated a positive effect of treatment in both discourse contexts, although the magnitude of the treatment effect was greater in the bookreading context than in the structured discourse context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doyle et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: