Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1/2 (PARP-1/2) inhibition enhances radiation-induced cytotoxicity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in vitro and in vivo, and the mechanism by which this occurs. METHODS: Pancreatic carcinoma cells were treated with ABT-888, radiation, or both. In vitro cell viability, apoptosis, and PARP activity were measured. Orthotopic xenografts were generated in athymic mice and treated with ABT-888 (25mg/kg), radiation (5Gy), both, or no treatment. Mice were monitored with bioluminescence imaging. RESULTS: In vitro, treatment with ABT-888 and radiation led to higher rates of cell death after 8days (P < .01). Co-treatment with 5Gy and 1, 10 or 100μmol/l of ABT-888 led to dose enhancement factors of 1.29, 1.41 and 2.36, respectively. Caspase activity was not significantly increased when treated with ABT-888 (10 μmol/l) alone (1.28-fold, P = .08), but became significant when radiation was added (2.03-fold, P < .01). PARP activity increased post-radiation and was abrogated following co-treatment with ABT-888. In vivo, treatment with ABT-888, radiation or both led to tumor growth inhibition (TGI) of 8, 30 and 39days, and survival at 60days of 0%, 0% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ABT-888 with radiation significantly enhanced tumor response in vitro and in vivo. ABT-888 inhibited PAR protein polymerization resulting in dose-dependent feedback up-regulation of PARP and p-ATM suggesting increased DNA damage. This translated into enhancement in TGI and survival with radiation in vivo. In vitro PAR levels correlated with levels of tumor apoptosis suggesting potential as a predictive biomarker. These data are being used to support a Phase I study in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuli et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: