BACKGROUND: Daivobet is a once-daily treatment of psoriasis vulgaris containing betamethasone dipropionate and calcipotriol in a new ointment vehicle. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of once-daily treatment with Daivobet (4 weeks) followed by calcipotriol (4 weeks) compared to tacalcitol (8 weeks). METHODS: Resource utilization was assessed within a double-blind 8-week clinical trial (all treatments for psoriasis, adverse events and concomitant dermatological medication), estimated from the French societal perspective. RESULTS: Total direct medical costs for psoriasis were comparable (Daivobet: EUR 107.53 and tacalcitol EUR 113.50) despite a higher acquisition cost for Daivobet. The probability of > or =75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (effectiveness criterion) was 46.6% with Daivobet and 13.9% with tacalcitol at 4 weeks, and 44.6 and 23.8%, respectively, at 8 weeks (both: p < 0.001). Over 8 weeks, Daivobet was almost twice as cost-effective as tacalcitol (EUR 241.22 per successful treatment vs. EUR 476.70); this result was robust to sensitivity assumptions. CONCLUSION: Daivobet is more effective and less costly than tacalcitol for treating psoriasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peeters et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: