Key result
Electrophysiological study investigates the mechanism of double His potential advancement during atrial scan pacing.
This case report presents an unusual electrophysiological response (double advancement of His potential) during atrial scan pacing to elucidate the mechanism of a post-ablation supraventricular tachycardia.
May refine His bundle pacing mechanisms; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
A 48‐year‐old man was referred for radiofrequency ablation of a narrow QRS tachycardia. At baseline, the atrio‐His (AH) and His‐ ventricular (HV) intervals were 70 and 70 ms, respectively. A dual atrioventricular nodal physiology was observed by programed atrial extra‐stimulation. A narrow QRS tachycardia was induced by atrial burst pacing with double ventricular response (Figure 1). The AH, HA, and HV interval during the tachycardia were 360, 40, and 70 ms, respectively. During the tachycardia (SVT‐1), the earliest atrial site was His region. A V‐A‐V sequence was observed after RV entrainment pacing and the difference between the post pacing interval (PPI) and TCL corrected by AH interval (cPPI‐TCL) was 196 ms. Atrial scan pacing (A‐scan) from the coronary sinus (CS) ostium terminated SVT‐1. SVT‐1 was diagnosed as a slow‐fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). After slow pathway ablation, SVT‐2 was induced after isoproterenol infusion. The AH, HA and HV interval during SVT‐2 were 465, 40, and 70 ms, respectively. Atrial sequence was identical to SVT‐1. A V‐A‐V sequence was observed after RV entrainment pacing and cPPI‐TCL was 140 ms. A‐scan from CS advanced His potential immediately after stimulation and the following His potential (Figure 2). What is the mechanism of SVT‐2? 2 | COMMENTARY
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsunaga‐Lee et al. (2023) studied this question. Double advancement of the His potential during atrial scan pacing is investigated to determine its underlying electrophysiological mechanism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: