The Hoek–Brown constant m i is a key input parameter in the Hoek–Brown failure criterion developed for estimating rock mass properties. The Hoek–Brown constant m i values are traditionally estimated from results of triaxial compression tests, but these tests are time-consuming and expensive. In the absence of laboratory test data, guideline chart and empirical regression models have been proposed in the literature to estimate m i values, and they give a general trend of m i . Instead of only using either the guideline chart or regression models, information from both sources can be systematically integrated to improve estimates of m i . In this study, a Bayesian approach is developed for probabilistic characterization of m i , using information from guideline chart, regression model and site-specific uniaxial compression strength (UCS) test values. The probabilistic characterization of m i provides a large number of m i samples for conventional statistical analysis of m i , including its full probability distribution. The proposed approach is illustrated and validated using real UCS and triaxial compression test data from a granite site at Forsmark, Sweden. To evaluate the reliability of the proposed method, m i values estimated from the proposed method are compared with those predicted from a separate analysis which uses triaxial compression tests data. In addition, a sensitivity study is performed to explore the effect of site-specific input on the evolution of m i . The approach provides reasonable statistics and probability distribution of m i at a specific site, and the m i samples can be directly used in rock engineering design and analysis, especially in Hoek–Brown failure criterion to predict rock failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aladejare et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: